<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man-purse Contents Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/</link>
	<description>Thoughts and Fiction of Bobby Revell</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Revellian</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-15759</link>
		<dc:creator>Revellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-15759</guid>
		<description>@Kabatology: Sorry it took me 3 months to reply...haha! David Beckham looks like the kind of guy to carry a purse :shock:


@Debbie: Oh Yeah? Though this meme&#039;s expiration date has long since passed, I asked my boss for a meme extension LOL!!! I&#039;ll come see :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kabatology: Sorry it took me 3 months to reply&#8230;haha! David Beckham looks like the kind of guy to carry a purse <img src='http://revellian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Debbie: Oh Yeah? Though this meme&#8217;s expiration date has long since passed, I asked my boss for a meme extension LOL!!! I&#8217;ll come see <img src='http://revellian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Moneypenny</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-15756</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Moneypenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 06:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-15756</guid>
		<description>Hello Bobby Chung,

After months of reviewing the contents of Handbag with my undercover boss, M, I have revealed the approved contents in my Wednesday Bra Tuesday post @

http://moneypennydd.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/fireside-chat-with-bobby-chung-and-barack-obama/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bobby Chung,</p>
<p>After months of reviewing the contents of Handbag with my undercover boss, M, I have revealed the approved contents in my Wednesday Bra Tuesday post @</p>
<p><a href="http://moneypennydd.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/fireside-chat-with-bobby-chung-and-barack-obama/">http://moneypennydd.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/fireside-chat-with-bobby-chung-and-barack-obama/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What's in Your Vintage Shopping Bag Meme &#124; One of a Kind Wisconsin, LLC</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12650</link>
		<dc:creator>What's in Your Vintage Shopping Bag Meme &#124; One of a Kind Wisconsin, LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12650</guid>
		<description>[...] 6, 2008 by Michelle Gartner&#160;     A couple weeks ago I was tagged by Bobby to do the What&#8217;s in Your Handbag Meme. However, I really don&#8217;t think anyone wants to see into my purse. Basically my purse is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6, 2008 by Michelle Gartner&nbsp;     A couple weeks ago I was tagged by Bobby to do the What&#8217;s in Your Handbag Meme. However, I really don&#8217;t think anyone wants to see into my purse. Basically my purse is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kabatology</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12356</link>
		<dc:creator>Kabatology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12356</guid>
		<description>Do you like soccer?You should have heard of David Beckham; you need to see footballers go around, they all have their fancy Louis Vuitton purses and mp3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you like soccer?You should have heard of David Beckham; you need to see footballers go around, they all have their fancy Louis Vuitton purses and mp3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revellian</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12353</link>
		<dc:creator>Revellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12353</guid>
		<description>@Kabatology: Ah, so guys in Italy carry purses? I thought they were all in the mafia...lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kabatology: Ah, so guys in Italy carry purses? I thought they were all in the mafia&#8230;lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kabatology</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12346</link>
		<dc:creator>Kabatology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12346</guid>
		<description>Yes, I go with the Tic Tacs - I like to have sweet, minty-fresh... You never know!!!. 
If a purse is not in leather, then its no-purse. hahaha. (i live in Italy for now)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I go with the Tic Tacs &#8211; I like to have sweet, minty-fresh&#8230; You never know!!!.<br />
If a purse is not in leather, then its no-purse. hahaha. (i live in Italy for now)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revellian</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12341</link>
		<dc:creator>Revellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12341</guid>
		<description>Mel, Technorati authority only affects the people who actually use it as a blog search engine. I have never known anyone that actually uses it to search anything; therefore, Technorati is irrelevant.

Writing relevant and creative articles that are actually about something is the only reason any blog should ever get a link.

I have 48 individual articles that are on page one Google search results, many of which are #1. I did it simply by writing things people search for. I don&#039;t check my stats very often because they don&#039;t matter. When I started blogging, the first thing I did when looking at another blog was to check their page rank and Alexa stats (I once had a toolbar for both) and compare myself against them. This almost ruined my level of self-expression and desire to write great articles in favor of just improving stats. 

Once I stopped doing that, I freed myself. My blog has readers because I put so much into writing quality, not quantity.

The best bet is to do the same and disregard Technorati, page rank and all statistical separatism :smile:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel, Technorati authority only affects the people who actually use it as a blog search engine. I have never known anyone that actually uses it to search anything; therefore, Technorati is irrelevant.</p>
<p>Writing relevant and creative articles that are actually about something is the only reason any blog should ever get a link.</p>
<p>I have 48 individual articles that are on page one Google search results, many of which are #1. I did it simply by writing things people search for. I don&#8217;t check my stats very often because they don&#8217;t matter. When I started blogging, the first thing I did when looking at another blog was to check their page rank and Alexa stats (I once had a toolbar for both) and compare myself against them. This almost ruined my level of self-expression and desire to write great articles in favor of just improving stats. </p>
<p>Once I stopped doing that, I freed myself. My blog has readers because I put so much into writing quality, not quantity.</p>
<p>The best bet is to do the same and disregard Technorati, page rank and all statistical separatism <img src='http://revellian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12337</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12337</guid>
		<description>Hey Bobby,

I just thought I would share with you, and your readers, some of my my thoughts on Technorati, et al..... (It&#039;s all on my site:)

&quot;Many directories use a combination of Technorati Authority, Incoming Links, Google Page Ranks, etc. I know from personal experience and the experience of many other bloggers I know, that this also cannot be trusted. On one of my blogs, within a 2 month period my Google Page ranking went from a 0 to a 4, to a 3 and then to a 2, with no explanation.  My readership stayed the same.  In other words I do not trust PR.  Anyways, readership does not necessarly define a good site, it more defines good promotion of that sie.

With Technorati, they decide, usually in an arbitrary manner, your “Authority”. Technorati has a 180 day rule (only incoming links over the prior 180 days are counted towards your “Authority”.) I totally disagree with this rule. I believe that an incoming link should be counted for as long as the link, and/or the linking site, exists.

Also, with Technorati, if you have too many links on one post, they accuse you of “gaming” and freeze your “Authority”, as well as showing zero incoming links. I have also known them to arbitrarily reduce your authority by as much as 90%.  Linking games (memes) are part of the allure and fun of the blogging. Technorati doesn’t seem to understand that.

To continue my Technorati tirade…… On my other site, according to Technorati, I had approximately 5,200 “Blog Reactions.”  Now it seems, over night, I have 3,600 “Blog Reaction.”  This is simply another example of the unreliability and/or vinictiveness of Technorati, not to mention their arbitrary rules and their holier than though attitude..&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bobby,</p>
<p>I just thought I would share with you, and your readers, some of my my thoughts on Technorati, et al&#8230;.. (It&#8217;s all on my site:)</p>
<p>&#8220;Many directories use a combination of Technorati Authority, Incoming Links, Google Page Ranks, etc. I know from personal experience and the experience of many other bloggers I know, that this also cannot be trusted. On one of my blogs, within a 2 month period my Google Page ranking went from a 0 to a 4, to a 3 and then to a 2, with no explanation.  My readership stayed the same.  In other words I do not trust PR.  Anyways, readership does not necessarly define a good site, it more defines good promotion of that sie.</p>
<p>With Technorati, they decide, usually in an arbitrary manner, your “Authority”. Technorati has a 180 day rule (only incoming links over the prior 180 days are counted towards your “Authority”.) I totally disagree with this rule. I believe that an incoming link should be counted for as long as the link, and/or the linking site, exists.</p>
<p>Also, with Technorati, if you have too many links on one post, they accuse you of “gaming” and freeze your “Authority”, as well as showing zero incoming links. I have also known them to arbitrarily reduce your authority by as much as 90%.  Linking games (memes) are part of the allure and fun of the blogging. Technorati doesn’t seem to understand that.</p>
<p>To continue my Technorati tirade…… On my other site, according to Technorati, I had approximately 5,200 “Blog Reactions.”  Now it seems, over night, I have 3,600 “Blog Reaction.”  This is simply another example of the unreliability and/or vinictiveness of Technorati, not to mention their arbitrary rules and their holier than though attitude..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revellian</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12316</link>
		<dc:creator>Revellian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12316</guid>
		<description>Willow! I can&#039;t believe it&#039;s you! It&#039;s so great to hear from you :smile:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Willow! I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s you! It&#8217;s so great to hear from you <img src='http://revellian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~willow~</title>
		<link>http://revellian.com/2008/09/22/man-purse-contents-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-12304</link>
		<dc:creator>~willow~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 04:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://revellian.com/?p=702#comment-12304</guid>
		<description>Hey there!  Nice to see ya on the Entrecard circuit!  I just joined a few days ago, after &quot;reactivating&quot; myself after many months of silence.  

Enjoyed your take on this meme  :)

~willow~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there!  Nice to see ya on the Entrecard circuit!  I just joined a few days ago, after &#8220;reactivating&#8221; myself after many months of silence.  </p>
<p>Enjoyed your take on this meme  <img src='http://revellian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~willow~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
